Comments for Spartakan

Comment on 10 Years of ITC by Peter Cruickshank

Peter Cruickshank — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:40:51 +0000

Thanks!

Comment on 10 Years of ITC by James Coltham

James Coltham — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:57:15 +0000

Happy Birthday ITC. Sorry again that I coudn’t make the celebrations – the cake looked good! I look forward to seeing how the centre develops over the next decade.

Comment on E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram by PEP-NET » Blog Archive » Weekly eParticipation News digest – October 10th–16th 2009

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:04:11 +0000

[...] The team of the EuroPetition project has presented a comprehensive flowchart describing the inner workings of online petitioning systems. It both incorporates the steps of the lifespan of an online petition and the different technical and procedural components necessary to make it work. spartakan.wordpress.com [...]

Comment on Self-efficacy as a factor in evaluation of e-petitions by Political self-efficacy… mmm (updated) « Spartakan

Political self-efficacy… mmm (updated) « Spartakan — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:41:08 +0000

[...] Tags: participation, politics, self-efficacy trackback I wrote with my colleage Colin Smith a brief paper on the use of self-efficacy in evaluating e-participation, which I presented at EDEM09 yesterday. [...]

Comment on E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram by E-petitioning flow diagram | Local Democracy

E-petitioning flow diagram | Local Democracy — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:50:53 +0000

[...] won’t spoil the surprise. It’s over here. Related Posts:Systems lockdown – the resistance!Twitter – love it / hate it???World map of social [...]

Comment on EU review of eParticipation, petitions and empowering communities by E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram « Spartakan

E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram « Spartakan — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:31:35 +0000

[...] Having a flow diagram like this is useful in helping non-technical people understand the petitioning process, particularly with the coming requirement on English local authorities to have online petitioning I mentioned before. [...]

Comment on Self-efficacy as a factor in evaluation of e-petitions by E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram « Spartakan

E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram « Spartakan — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:27:30 +0000

[...] In my diagram, I use a four-stage model to illustrate the processes involved during the life of an individual petition. A variant form appeared in the paper I presented at EDEM09. [...]

Comment on e-Petitioning for the UK parliament by Updated model of an e-petitioning system « Spartakan

Updated model of an e-petitioning system « Spartakan — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:25:43 +0000

[...] an idealised summary flow diagram of the process. It’s kind of a prettified update of the model I drew from the discussion the UK Parliament held on how its proposed petitioning system should work. The [...]

Comment on Review of petitions at the Scottish Parliament by Scottish Parliament debates their petitioning system « Spartakan

Scottish Parliament debates their petitioning system « Spartakan — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:20:16 +0000

[...] petitioning, scotland trackback Laste news: While I was away (on the 23rd), the debate on June’s report on the Scottish Parliament’s petitioning system took [...]

Comment on EDEM 09: Some challenges for e-government by Tim

Tim — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:38:18 +0000

Thanks for the write-up, Peter! Look forward to more coverage as I’m trying to follow the event from the US.