There’s not much to say that hasn’t been said already, so here’s a couple of blogs that pick up on the e-government/administration side of things:

The NAO claim they never wanted any personal data, so the question is: how did a ‘junior official’ have the rights to dump off a database full of personal information? I wonder if Deepak Singh is feeling any pressure right now?

From the comments on the Register (and many other places);

“…the NAO requested data on child benefit claimants in a “desensitised” form, with bank accounts and other personal data removed, in March.

“…the reason given for turning down the NAO request was that desensitising the information would require an extra payment to the data services provider EDS.”

PFI and outsourcing rule!

And finally, a Peter Brookes cartoon from the Times:

Alistair Darling must wish it it was that simple…


About Peter Cruickshank

Lecturer in the School of Computing and a member of the Centre for Social Informatics at Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland. Interested in information systems, learning, politics, society, security and where they intersect. My attempts at rounding out my character include food, cinema, running, history and, together with my lovely wife, bringing up a cat and a couple of kids.
This entry was posted in Audit, Daily Links, e-government, egovernment, news, Security, UK. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s