E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram

E-Petition Process 2009 versionAs part of the EuroPetition project, I created for myself (and the others in the project) an idealised summary flow diagram of the process. It’s a four-stage model is used to illustrate the processes involved during the life of an individual petition , based on one I had done last year relating to the UK Parliament. Downloadable PDF available below.

The four stages a high-level overview of processes involved during the life of an individual petition, while showing the significant detailed processes. A variant form appeared in the paper I presented at EDEM09:  it’s kind of a prettified update of the model I drew from the discussion the UK Parliament held on how its proposed petitioning system should work. The main changes have been to flesh out some of the details, highlighting optional elements, while being less specific about how the impact could take place.

The other change is to take into account how the Public-i system that is at the heart of EuroPetition works – I would like to thank the folks at Public-i and in the project generally for their input when putting this together.

Follow this link to download the much clearer PDF version. Contact me if you’re interested in getting the original Word document.

Having a flow diagram like this is useful in helping non-technical people understand the petitioning process, particularly with the coming requirement on English local authorities to have online petitioning I mentioned before.

Note the way this diagram brings out the importance of officers in supporting the petitioning process, with the petitioner only having a limited role within the system between submission and completion, particularly if they are not involved in moderating or facilitating a parallel online debate. An obvious omission is the role of the media in all this…

The diagram is also good for finding useful points at which data can be collected. Read below for my thoughts on what data can be collected and when from the actors and from the application itself.

I will blog in future on the common issues designers of e-petitioning systems face, and nature of the data that can be captured – but this will do for now.

Gathering data from the system

As with any ICT system the two major sources of information that are available for measuring the system are, whether for evaluation or for management:

  • Participants (aka the actors in the system)
  • The system – mainly the application database but hopefully supplemented by stats from the webserver.

Data from actors

From the flow diagram it is possible to identify the points at data can be gathered and from there to link the actors to the data requirements and identify the most appropriate instrument to use (probably online questionnaires supplemented by focus groups). The principles should apply for most e-petitioning systems.

Actors Stage at which data is gathered Purpose
Petitioner On submission of petition (1) Demographics, motivations and expectations of petitioner, existing engagement with the political system
Participating Citizens After signature submitted (2) Demographics, existing engagement, perceptions of quality of debate, expectations
How was the petition found, actions after signing the petition
Forum moderators
(if applicable)
After petition closed (or on six-monthly/annual cycles) (3) Establish perceptions of usefulness of debates and lessons to learn (eg on moderation, anonymity)
Petitioner On completion of petitions. (4)
Focus group of peers after tool has been operational for a suitable period
Perceptions of the process, Whether expectations have been met
Assembly Officers, process facilitators On six-monthly/annual cycles (5) Understand context of processes
Elected representative (and their support staff) On annual cycles plus event after elections (6) Establish expectations and perceptions at the political level

In case you haven’t worked it out, the numbers in (brackets) correspond to points on the diagram.

Data from the application

The system itself should of course generate as much data as possible – and be as transparent to the users and managers of the system as possible.

Stage Question(s) Deduced from data from system
Submit draft Petition How many are submitted Numbers and outcomes
Refer to EU or region Why? Ultimate outcome? Numbers, time taken, reason
Petition denied (with reason) Why? Numbers, time taken, reason
Issue resolved How and why? Numbers, time taken, reason
Petition entered onto system How many? How long? What subjects? Numbers, time taken, subject
2.Input and Dialogue
Open and close (Impact of) no of days open Period petition was open
Collect signatures Volumes Number by week or day
Online debate Volumes, subjects, quality Volumes of activity
Withdraw or resolve and log reason How many and why? Date withdrawn or resolved
Comment from owner Period taken

These data requirements have obvious implications for database design.

Update: Fixed link to Public-i site – they chose this week to introduce major changes


About Peter Cruickshank

Lecturer in the School of Computing and a member of the Centre for Social Informatics at Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland. Interested in information systems, learning, politics, society, security and where they intersect. My attempts at rounding out my character include food, cinema, running, history and, together with my lovely wife, bringing up a cat and a couple of kids.
This entry was posted in e-democracy, e-participation, Europe, research, thoughts, UK and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to E-Petitioning a Council: A new flow diagram

  1. Pingback: E-petitioning flow diagram | Local Democracy

  2. Pingback: PEP-NET » Blog Archive » Weekly eParticipation News digest – October 10th–16th 2009

  3. Pingback: Has e-petitioning been ‘useless’? | Spartakan

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s